<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DavidNikel.org.uk &#187; tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidnikel.org.uk/tag/tech/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidnikel.org.uk</link>
	<description>A Liberal Democrat campaigner in Birmingham Ladywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Digital Britain for Birmingham</title>
		<link>http://www.davidnikel.org.uk/uncategorized/2009/06/digital-britain-for-birmingham</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidnikel.org.uk/uncategorized/2009/06/digital-britain-for-birmingham#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Nikel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TNT News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalbirmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digitalbritain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhubarbradio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidnikel.org.uk/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've done my best to wade through the Digital Britain report this evening, but I hold my hands up and say I've got nowhere near it! It's a beefier document than I expected. My initial thoughts are cautiously positive, although there are plenty of points I'd like to have seen included or expanded on. I'm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've done my best to wade through the Digital Britain report this evening, but I hold my hands up and say I've got nowhere near it! It's a beefier document than I expected. My initial thoughts are cautiously positive, although there are plenty of points I'd like to have seen included or expanded on. I'm also not convinced about the 50p landline tax.</p>
<p>Rather than spew out my thoughts sporadically I'm going to take my time giving the document a thorough review to gauge its impact on Birmingham. In the meantime, keep an eye on Rhubarb Radio's fantastic <a href="http://digitalbritain.rhubarbradio.com/" target="_blank">Digital Britain mini-site</a> which will carry live coverage of tomorrow's big debate at the ICC.</p>
<p>More soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidnikel.org.uk/uncategorized/2009/06/digital-britain-for-birmingham/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
